furthermore, since they respond more in a linear fashion, I think they shouldn't be called dynamics processors, they should be called something else. I know they promote their plugins as "transparent" but if every dynamic plugin of theirs in the version 3 barely add partials and are responding in a similar linear fashion, then it seems to me that they are almost doing the same kind of processing, therefore it can be said that all of their dynamic plugins are identical bc they work very similar to each other. I'm particularly curious about if the evo channel's dynamic and non linear processing add partials to the signal, since the old r2r version cannot be loaded inside the latest r2r plugindoctor and therefore cannot be tested, at least on my end, but from what I've seen in the tests that I've conducted, almost all of the flux dynamic plugins barely seem to add any partials to the signal, even at their fastest settings (some of them does add partials just when very fast lookahead is applied), just when the signal is pushed very very hard they add some, but in the form of IMD partials will eventually alias but it seems to be a trivial point. Yeah that's correct, just wanted to throw a comment in about that since u dedicated a comment specifically on the phase group stuff.
0 kommentar(er)
